…..

Applying Ethical Principles

Applying ethics is an imperative part of healthcare system, which helps create a fair and reacting care environment. These directives are simple guides by which ethical issues, such as genetic testing or patient autonomy, can be solved. Giving priority to the ethics principles like beneficence, justice and autonomy (Brown, Jones & Miller, 2022), medical professionals are enabling patients’ rights and supporting their well-being. To continue, when exemplified by Dr. Harper and Mrs. Bennett, autonomy provides Mrs. Bennett the right to decide the spread of her child’s genetic information. Nonetheless, ethical practice also requires us to contemplate the wider implication of giving clinical information and helps us understand the crucial role of communication (Gross, & Koffman, 2024). Respecting for autonomy and transparency should be both considered as being in this case decisions are made and trust and treatment integrity are preserved. The utilization of ethical principles serves to maintain fairness in the conduct of practitioners, is a testament to their integrity, and champions patient-centered care. Such an environment in which ethical behavior is normalized creates a culture of ethical excellence.

Summary and Analysis of Case Study

The ethical dilemma in the case involving Dr.Leonard Harper and Mrs.Clara Bennett is positioned on the choices concerning a genetic test and patients’ autonomy. Mrs. Bennett, who is a 38 years of age professor of literature, plans to take a prenatal genetic test performed as she is anxious that subjected to the background health problems might have an effect on her pregnancy and her age is too small for it. The test is given to Mrs. Bennett by Dr. Harper who is the most passionate about one’s health choice. From his test it can be seen that the risk of During this moment, Alex is shaken by the unexpected loss of his commanding officer and by the continuous psychological pressure made by Dr. Harper. She turns to Dr. Harper and asks him not to tell her other half about this, as she is certain that this would double the stress on their ongoing relationship. The dilemma for the doctor can be stated as the doctor either keeping Mrs. Bennett patient in the dark or revealing the information that would affect her partner with which the doctor not only limits autonomy of the patient but also withholds information vital to her partner. It is during such as a circumstance that you really understand the role that personal autonomy plays within the family structure as well as that of its surroundings on how health decisions are made and on whom. Through Dr. Harper’s moral crisis, the three concepts of autonomy, beneficence, and fairness emerge as important factors in the moral issues of healthcare in such changing times.

Overview of Ethical Issues in the Case Study

The dilemma in the story seems to be based on the problem of the balance in the process of the patients’ autonomy in the process of the provision of information and the risks of withholding some of the information that may be confidential to family members about their relatives. Geneticist Dr. Len Harper who has ample experience behind his back faces the dilemma of autonomy and beneficence. Unlike Mrs. Clara Bennett who has the ability to oversee the public release of information related to her child’s genes which her expectant mother in respect to the autonomy principle can be distinguished. Regarding the issue of Mrs. Bennett’s husband, Captain Jack Bennett, Dr. Harper should also consider the chances of lying to this man about his wife’s condition, which is against the principle of beneficence that aims at enhancing the welfare of everyone. Ethics issues when the questions of Mrs. Bennett’s autonomy and the risks that it can create for the family relationships and medical choices are interacting. Dr. Harper has to handle this complex situation with due care, thus the family has to be informed and Mrs. Bennett’s autonomy has to be respected (Garcia, Martinez, & Perez, 2023).

Application of the Ethical Decision-Making Model in the Case Study

Applying a moral decision-making model to Dr. Leonard Harper’s case entails a thoughtful overview of your moral perception, judgment, and behavior. At first, Dr. Harper has the challenge to demonstrate that he is aware of the ethical dilemma of Mrs. Clara Bennett’s decision to not disclose genetic testing results to her spouse, Lieutenant Jack Bennett, among the conflict between the principles of autonomy and beneficence (Brown, Jones, & Miller, 2022). Consequently, it highlights the importance of addressing the possible consequences of such secrecy on relationships and medica